God and the Kings
or
Blanche does it again
in
The Life and Death
of King John
That
Shakespeare lived and wrote in a time of religious turbulence we all know. Many of his plays reflect this. None more, perhaps, than The Life and
Death of King John. And few more dramatically than in Act 3:1 where a great
clash between church and state is compacted into some of Shakespeare’s most
politically pithy lines.
The
situation is this:
King
John of England is at war with King Philip of France. King John (the wicked
prince in the Robin Hood legend and the signer of the Magna Carta, though there
is no mention of that in the play) is brother to the deceased older brothers
Geoffrey and Richard the Lionheart. Philip is friends with Constance, widow of
Geoffrey and mother of young Prince Arthur, who she claims is the rightful King
of England. The marriage between John’s kinswoman Blanche and the Dauphin of
France, Lewis, has just taken place, creating peace between the two kingdoms.
Constance is furious. To add fuel to the fire John has angered the pope who has
sent his legate Pandulph to confront him.
So we
have two conflicts. The keeping or
breaking of vows to the pope? And war or peace between England and France?
John,
Philip, Constance, the Duke of Austria and the Bastard (son of Richard the
Lionheart) are already bickering, with Blanche looking on, when Cardinal
Pandulph enters demanding to know why John has spurned the pope’s chosen
archbishop of Canterbury.
To
which John retorts:
What earthy name to
interrogatories
Can test the free
breath of a sacred king?
Though canst not,
cardinal…
…no Italian priest
Shall tithe or toll
in our dominions:
But as we, under
heaven, are supreme head,
…we will alone
uphold
Without th’
assistance of a mortal hand:
So tell the Pope,
all reverence set apart
To him and his
usurped authority.
Words
well appreciated by non-Catholics in Elizabethan England, one can assume.
When
Philip, shocked, exclaims, ‘Brother of England, you blaspheme in this’, John
says contemptuously:
Though you and all
the kings of Christendom
Are led so grossly
by the meddling priest,
Dreading the curse
that money may buy out,
And by the merit of
vile gold, dross, dust,
Purchase corrupted
pardon of a man,
Who is that sale
sells pardon from himself:
Though you and all
the rest so grossly led
This juggling
witchcraft with revenue cherish,
Yet I alone, alone
do me oppose
Against the Pope,
and count his friends my foes.
A
fine Protestant rallying battle cry! Brave words from good old King John. Not
that he sticks to them. He soon repents and returns to the fold but it sounds
good when he says them.
Constance
already hates John for as she sees it usurping the throne from young Arthur and
she jumps at the chance to use his words against him:
O, lawful let it be
That I have room
with Rome to curse awhile:
…when law can do no
right,
Let it be lawful
that law bar no wrong:
Law cannot give my
child his kingdom here;
For he that holds
the kingdom holds the law;
Therefore, since
law itself is perfect wrong,
How can the law
forbid my tongue to curse?
She
challenges King Philip to break with John. Lewis, the Dauphin, too, encourages
his father to resume enmities with England:
Bethink you, father,
for the difference
Is purchase of a
heavy curse from Rome,
Or the light loss
of England for a friend:
Forego the easier.
His
newly acquired wife Blanche, who does not want to become the enemy of her
kinsman’s England, entreats him to choose the other, ‘That’s the curse of
Rome,’ and Constance says:
Oh, Lewis, stand
fast: the devil tempts thee here
In likeness of a
new untrimmèd bride.
To
which Blanche replies:
The lady Constance
speaks not from her faith,
But from her need.
Well.
I
think I’ll stop right there. They go on bickering and in the end they go to war
and switch loyalties back and forth to fit the changing power balance but Blanche
has done it again. She is a minor character but with this throw-away line, that
is in fact a show stopper if you think about it, she captures the essence of
the play.
They
all speak not from faith but from need. Or, more likely, simple greed and
ambition.
That
sums it all up, doesn’t it? Gods or kings? Both or neither. It depends on where
you are in the power struggle at the moment, doesn’t it?
Shakespeare
knows, and shows, this.
Works cited:
- William Shakespeare, the Complete Works, the RSC edition, 2007. Edited by Jonathan Bate and Eric Rasmussen
Films seen:
- BBC, 1984. Director: David Giles. Cast: Lady Blanche – Janet Maw: King John – Leonard Rossiter; the Bastard – George Costigan; Queen Eleanor – Marry Morris; Constance – Claire Bloom; Hubert – John Thaw: King Philip – Charles Kay; Louis the Dauphin – Jonathan Coy.
- A well done production. The play is going on at the Globe this summer so maybe we can hoped for the filmed version in a year or so.
No comments:
Post a Comment